Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976
WebNov 13, 2013 · Philippine Airlines (PAL) and the Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) have ended a two-year labor dispute by agreeing to reinstate all … WebCourt of Appeals dismissed the petition... filed by herein petitioner Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL); accordingly, the appellate court affirmed... case arose from a labor Complaint, [7] …
Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976
Did you know?
WebFeb 20, 2024 · Illegal dismissal case of Philippine Airlines pilots who allegedly joined a strike and failed to report to work in compliance with DOLE's return-to-work order. The Supreme Court declared as valid the dismissal of Philippine Airlines pilots except for one, who was found to be on maternity leave. Her WebARMANDO G. YRASUEGUI, petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., respondents. G. No. 168081, October 17, 2008 (569 SCRA 467) VERSION 1: FACTS: THIS case portrays the peculiar story of an international flight steward who was dismissed because of his failure to adhere to the weight standards of the airline company.
WebSep 27, 2010 · The Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA), represented by its hold-over president Alexander O. Barrientos, appeals the decision rendered on … WebPAL VS NLRC 225 SCRA 301 (1993) FACTS: On March 15, 1985, the Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL) completely revised its 1966 Code of Discipline. The Code was circulated …
WebJul 4, 2024 · Petitioner: PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) Respondents: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (NLRC), LABOR ARBITER ISABEL P. ORTIGUERA, and PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PALEA) DOCTRINE: Indeed, industrial peace cannot be achieved if the employees are denied their just participation in … Web1. declaring the defendant, Philippine Air Lines, Inc. otherwise known as ‘PAL’ as a government-controlled corporation and, therefore, falling within the purview of Republic …
WebOn February 14, 1963, the Philippine Air Lines Employees' Association (PALEA) and the Philippine Air Lines Supervisors' Association (PALSA) — petitioners in G.R. No. L …
WebJan 20, 2009 · This Court has repeatedly held that execution is the final stage of litigation, 20 the fruit and end of the suit. 21 Thus, the proceedings before the RTC were not terminated by the filing of the appeal to the CA. The same could not be executed - hence, not yet terminated - until the appeal is decided with finality. task and purpose politics and pressureWebFirst Philippine International Bank, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., 252 SCRA 259 (1996). Five-Star Bus Company, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 313 SCRA 367 (1999). Lo Sui v. task and purpose words armyWebPetitioners and petitioners-in-intervention filed the instant petitions for prohibition under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court seeking to prohibit the Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) and the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) and its Secretary from implementing the following agreements executed by the … task and purpose website biasWebAug 13, 1993 · PALEA alleged that copies of the Code had been circulated in limited numbers; that being penal in nature the Code must conform with the requirements of sufficient publication, and that the Code was arbitrary, oppressive, and prejudicial to the rights of the employees. task and purpose wikipediaWebPALEA, as the winner in that election, was certified by the BLR as the exclusive bargaining agent of all the rank-and-file employee of the Philippine Airlines, Inc. PALEA and PAL signed a 3-year collective bargaining agreement effective October 1, … the bubble tropesWebJul 6, 2012 · Philippine Air Lines, Inc., 70 SCRA 244 (1976) invoked by the claimants in G.R. Nos. 104911-14 is inapplicable to the cases at bench ( Rollo, p. 21). The said case … task and purpose usmcWebJul 23, 2008 · WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Office renders judgment declaring that Philippine Airlines, Inc., illegally retrenched One Thousand Four Hundred (1,400) … the bubble trailer 2022