http://slf4j.org/log4shell.html Witryna14 gru 2024 · TIBCO is aware of the recently announced Apache Log4J vulnerability …
Comments on the log4shell (CVE-2024-44228) …
Witryna8 sty 2024 · 8. Using SLF4J means that replacing the implementation is very easy if company policy changes, e.g. when your company is acquired and new policies forced on you. Using SLF4J now, when you write the code, will take no more time than using Log4j directly. Replacing direct Log4j calls later will take a lot of time. WitrynaWhile the Log4j 2 API will provide the best performance, Log4j 2 provides support for the Log4j 1.2, SLF4J, Commons Logging and java.util.logging (JUL) APIs. Avoid lock-in. Applications coded to the Log4j 2 API always have the option to use any SLF4J-compliant library as their logger implementation with the log4j-to-slf4j adapter. gregg\u0027s heating and air
log4j - CVE-2024-44228 + slf4j + common-logging - Stack Overflow
Witryna20 gru 2024 · I am working to fix any log4j dependency on my project. I looked for references of log4j in the dependency tree and I could only find this org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.7.32:runtime. How do I confirm whether this dependency is fine or not, If someone can help. That lib is an adapter, you can ignore it. log4j-core is the affected … Witryna24 lut 2024 · Build 8.4.0-19066669 (release date 12/16/2024) is log4j 2.16 based and is not vulnerable. Build 8.4.0-19050221(release date 12/14/2024) and 18964730 (release date 11/30/2024) are not vulnerable but a new build has been published for mitigating the scenario where security scans will show an unused but vulnerable log4j jar. … Witryna14 gru 2024 · The Log4j 1.x Compatibility API ( log4j-1.2-api.jar) is not affected by any security vulnerability of Log4j 1.x. However, if you use Log4j 2.x Core as backend for the Log4j 2.x API, you are affected by the vulnerabilities of Log4j 2.x Core. The last known one was fixed in version 2.17.0, published a couple of days after your question. gregg\u0027s ranch dressing ingredients